Opinion

Flu shot letter response weak

I refer to Dr. Parker’s response “Anti-vaccine letter harmful” (November 23) to Ms. Craig’s letter “Flu shot picture doesn’t help” (November 21).

Dr. Parker’s letter contains no facts in the form of hard data and relies heavily on a “believe your doctor, he knows best” style of approach. The letter Dr. Parker refers to, that was written by eight BC Medical Health Officers, is more factual but almost completely lacking in numerical detail.

It is not good enough just to say flu shots have been associated with an increase in some desirable outcome, because the size of that improvement is vital information.  Even tiny improvements, e.g. one per cent or less, will be highly significant statistically if the sample size is big enough, so hard facts and figures are needed for people to be able to form a proper opinion on this important subject.

I would suggest Dr. Parker write again, this time giving a detailed, point by point refutation of Mr.Craig’s information which otherwise remains unchallenged.

Keith Newberry

Slocan

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Folk sextet launches debut song
 
COLUMN: Time to welcome the light
 
Easy win for hugs
OPINION: Hugs win again
 
COLUMN: Take the time to spend time together
 
Provincial prep for Nelson swimmers
Clark on climate, clawbacks, credit cards
 
Suspicious activity reported at Safeway
 
Former Cranbrook Colts player needs your help

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 19 edition online now. Browse the archives.