Kootenay Lake shoreline homeowners have expressed their displeasure with this week’s meeting at the North Shore Hall, where a guidance document was released. Photo: Will Johnson

Shoreline homeowners decry waterfront plan

Group feels excluded from process, feel report is problematic

They’re just not buying it.

The Kootenay Lake shoreline homeowners who attended a public meeting on Tuesday evening were not satisfied with the answers they received, and are afraid that following the newly released guidance document could result in them losing money.

“Waterfront owners can expect to pay thousands in consulting fees to develop waterfront — for example, applying for special permission for docks,” Cheryl Graham wrote in a press release.

She’s the president of the Kootenay Lake Waterfront Property Owner’s Society (KLWPOS), and during the meeting she expressed her concerns that new rules and regulations would be brought into effect, miring developers in red tape — something organizers assured her wouldn’t happen.

On top of that, she has a problem with the Kootenay Lake Partnership (KLP), which is headed up by Heather Leschied. According to Graham, the homeowners’ attempts to get involved with them were repeatedly rebuffed.

“We are saddened that our group was excluded in the development of these guidelines for the shorelines of Kootenay Lake. We … requested a seat at KLP years ago but were ignored, even though they let other non-government groups participate.”

Graham claims that there are a number of “inconsistencies, errors and problems” with the guidance document, a concern seconded by former RDCK Area E representative and waterfront owner Josh Smienk.

They’re worried that adding First Nations cultural concerns and archeological assessments into the mix will create an unreasonable financial burden for people looking to develop.

“Consulting with Native bands is the responsibility of the province, not individuals,” she wrote.

Smienk feels the government has made an error in judgment by excluding homeowners, and he criticized the consultation process.

During the meeting few questions were taken, the acoustics were poor and there was no microphone provided — another common gripe from the audience.

“Somehow the bureaucrats who drew up this plan thought it was best to exclude waterfront owners participation in this important planning document … This is not a transparent process, and the public meeting was a waste of people’s time.”

Just Posted

Site C dam goes ahead, cost estimate now up to $10.7 billion

Premier John Horgan says Christy Clark left him no other choice

Leafs dig out of funk

Mid-season stumble ends with 4-1 win

PHOTOS: Whitewater opens season in style

On Friday Whitewater opened for the 2017/2018 winter season — the stoke was real

Nelson plans sewer and water rate increases for 2018

The increase will amount to $18.00 per year for a single family dwelling

Nelson remembers victims of gender violence

The B.C. government announced $112,280 in additional funding to local women organizations

VIDEO: New series takes in-depth look at sexual harassment in B.C.

Black Press takes a hard look at sexual harassment in B.C.

Local fabric artist Kate Bridger opens exhibit at Nelson Public Library

Bridger will be exhibited at the Nelson Public Library until Dec. 31

Nelson council updates banner policy

The purpose of the banner is to publicize events

Paul Saso releases Kootenay Inspired at Touchstones Nelson

8 years in the making, Saso’s book looks at the people who inspire him in our community

Glacier trio shines in Kelowna

Dafni van Hellemond, Eden Bellman and Brianne Stefani took home 12 medals last weekend

COLUMN: 100 years since the Halifax explosion

Greg Scott looks at significant events from the past 100 years.

COLUMN: Trimming back for the holidays

Anne DeGrace talks about cutting back over Christmas

Hwy. 1 avalanche improvements promise less delays

B.C.’s new remote avalanche-control systems near Revelstoke are ready for avalanche season

Most Read