Dog bylaw makes no sense

I am not entirely opposed to a dog bylaw being adopted for Area H, but I absolutely cannot accept the proposal in the recent mailout.

I am not entirely opposed to a dog bylaw being adopted for Area H, but I absolutely cannot accept the proposal in the recent mailout. With all due respect, this sample bylaw sounds like it was written decades ago. We are now living in a more compassionate era and the way we treat animals should reflect that.

A bylaw dealing with dangerous dogs, if properly defined, is surely one that most of us would not oppose. People should be compensated if they, their dogs, cats or livestock are killed or injured by a dog and fines would be appropriate as well. At the same time, landowners themselves need to be responsible for protecting livestock from cougars, coyotes, bears and various other predators including dogs. The installation of electric fences would be a good place to start.

My strongest objection to this bylaw is that in Part III – 3 and Part IV – 2 and 6 it states that after seven days the animal control officer can destroy the dog. Collaboration with the SPCA or Homes 4 Animals would ensure that animals are re-homed if at all possible. No animal should even be considered for euthanasia unless it is incurably ill or vicious. I can picture dozens of scenarios in which the unwarranted killing of a beloved companion animal under this bylaw could result from extenuating circumstances and cause serious mental trauma.

Many of us in the Kootenays take pride in our efforts to live compassionate lives. This bylaw not only regards dogs as mere possessions but it considers them inferior to inanimate objects. To illustrate my point, when I had tenants stiff me for two months’ rent and then disappear, I legally had to store, at my expense, all the worthless stuff they left on the premises for several months before being allowed to dispose of it… and our best friends have seven days?

Part II – 2: “Every owner of a dog shall keep the dog on a leash while it is not on the owner’s property.” This is absolutely unreasonable and unfair to responsible dog owners that regularly take well behaved animals for walks, especially for those not living on acreages, without the development of a number of large designated off leash areas. These areas are vital because socialization plays a huge role in the development of a well balanced dog and living in a remote area already makes this challenging. Some regulations on disposing of dog poop would certainly make many trail users happy.

Dogs running loose without supervision can be a different situation altogether. I certainly have felt frightened on occasion and several acquaintances have been bitten while biking or hiking on the rails to trails by dogs most likely protecting their properties. There is also the danger of dogs packing up and running down wildlife. On the other hand, there are a lot of very friendly dogs in my neighbourhood and I think developing regulations on order of conduct would be more readily accepted than the draconian on leash rule. I also think people need to be made aware that if a car ends up in the river as a result of swerving to avoid hitting their dog, they are liable for damages.

I would suggest changing the term guide dogs to accredited service dogs and adding that dogs who have earned their canine good neighbour certificates be allowed off leash anytime when in the company of a person.

I am really disappointed that this bylaw does not address any important animal protection issues. I would support a set of bylaws that include regulations on cruelty and safety issues such as: No animal should be fettered for more than two hours per day. Regular contact/socialization with humans or other domestic animals, access to water and proper shelter need to be provided. (I’m afraid if this bylaw passes as is, we will see more dogs tied up. It’s much cheaper than the more humane fencing option.)

Instead of a simple yes or no ballot we absolutely need more input from the community and I urge people not to accept this draft but to submit their opinions and suggestions along with the ballot. I suggest the RDCK rewrite the bylaw in collaboration with the community, including some of our local progressive dog experts and trainers, to come up with a fair and comprehensive plan.

Evelyn Kirkaldy

Slocan Park

 

Just Posted

Nelson Reflections win at synchro provincials

Nelson’s synchronized swimming team triumphed at the Jean Peters Provincial Championship

Here we go again: Mamma Mia! set to open at the Capitol Theatre

The ABBA-inspired musical runs Thursday to Sunday

LETTERS: The other side of the Women’s Centre story

From readers Vita Luthmers and Hannah Hadikin

Nelson holds the line on property taxes

No increase this year thanks to deal with RDCK on park funding

West Kootenay opinion sought on health care issues

Rural Evidence Review getting strong response to survey call-out

Kelowna toddler suffers cracked skull after fall from balcony

Neighbour who found the two-year-old boy said he has a bump the size of a golf ball on his head

Pipeline protester chimes in on Justin Trudeau’s B.C. fundraising speech

The government purchased the Trans Mountain pipeline and expansion project for $4.5 billion

Canada stripping citizenship from Chinese man over alleged marriage fraud

The move comes amid severely strained relations between Ottawa and Beijing

Nevada court orders former Vancouver man to pay back $21.7 million to investors

The commission says Michael Lathigee committed fraud over a decade ago

Support growing for orphaned Okanagan child after father dies in highway crash

Family thanks emergency crews for assistance in traumatic incident

Baby boom seniors putting pressure on B.C. long-term care: report

B.C. leads Canada in growth of dementia, dependence on care

RCMP probe if teen was intentionally hit with ski pole by mystery skier on B.C. mountain

The incident happened on March 20 on Grouse Mountain. Police are urging witnesses to come forward

Roadside device to weed out THC can’t detect impairment, B.C. lawyer says

‘This fact alone is likely to have serious implications for Canadians’ Charter Rights,’ lawyer Sarah Leamon warns

B.C. firefighters rescue frozen dog from ice

The fire crew found a dog stuck in the at Lake Paul on May 20

Most Read