LETTER: Consult public on pool surplus

I am delighted to see this windfall substantially reducing the taxation of $5.2 million previously approved and budgeted for by the RDCK.

The fate of surplus money from the Nelson pool reno should be put to a public meeting

Re: “Nelson pool windfall still being debated”

As a retired, longtime director of electoral Area F of the RDCK, and an active participant in the original construction committee of the present Nelson and District Community Complex I am delighted to see this windfall substantially reducing the taxation funding of $5.2 million previously approved and budgeted for by the RDCK.

As I recall this taxation is under the jurisdiction of the Nelson and Area Recreation Commission with taxation coming from the defined areas of the City of Nelson, all of Area F (basically Kokanee Park to and including Bonnington) and defined portion of Area E (basically Blewett, Mountain Station to Horlick’s Point) and is currently under discussion by the five appointed directors of the RDCK (three from city, one Area F and one defined Area E).

While, as a taxpayer, I do agree with some of the new allocations I understand are under consideration (facility reserves and heat exchanger project) I feel very strongly that taxpayers who are paying the bills should have the opportunity to voice their collective opinions in the form of a public meeting hosted by the directors of the Nelson and Area Recreation Commission prior to re-allocation of the surplus taxation of approximately $970,000 per year.

Perhaps a little history of the building of the current facility would be appropriate for not only the benefit of Nelson area newcomers but also some of the recently elected city councillors and RDCK directors. After the city went to two referendums in the mid-1990s and early 2000s which failed it was decided that a third referendum would be run by the RDCK with participants being as above (city and Area F and defined Area E) but the method of presenting the referendum would have the following rules of procedure:

A public committee was created of 10 to 12 taxpayers consisting of facility users, the business community, youth groups, senior groups, etc. from within the taxation area.

Their mandate was to have a series of public meetings and determine two key points for a referendum and a procedural change to be made for the public committee meetings.

1. What functions did the public want in the new facility?

2. What they were prepared to pay in taxation for the new facility?

The procedural change made was that none of the participating elected officials could attend these organizational meeting to influence the recommendations and this rule was followed.

The outcome was that what the public wanted in the new facility and were prepared to pay was approximately $4 million short so the decision was made to go to referendum for $10.4 million with the $4 million difference to come from non-taxation sources with the elected officials and communities of Nelson, RDCK Area F and defined Area E to raise the money from senior government grants and other solicitations, which was done.

I mention this mainly to support my earlier request that before allocating the surplus created by the wonderful gas tax rebate funding the current stakeholders/decision makers offer the same opportunity to the taxpaying residents and the facility users. Before allocating the surplus, have direct consultation with the guys and gals paying the bills.

Time is of the essence but if it is important to our elected officials it can be done and you might be pleasantly surprised at the potential outcomes by showing this common courtesy.

Al Dawson, Electoral Area F

 

Just Posted

Nelson won’t restrict parking amnesty to West Kootenay

So far, more than 800 people have responded with amnesty payments

Annual Polar Bear Swim set for Jan. 1

The event is organized by Kootenay Co-op Radio

Coldest Night of the Year walk set for Feb. 23

The annual event raises money for Nelson CARES ‘Ready for Home’ program

Castlegar council set to rule on three retail cannabis proposals

Residents have until Dec. 27 to comment on the business proposals

Nelson Boxing named province’s top club

The club won several awards while going 13-1 at provincials

B.C. businesses evacuated due to emailed bomb threat, also received in U.S.

Penticton and Comox Valley businesses evacuated Thursday morning

Some Kotex tampons recalled in Canada and U.S.

In some cases, tampon users sought medical attention “to remove tampon pieces left in the body.”

Sex-assault squad investigated eight incidents at Toronto all-boys’ school

The interim president of a Roman Catholic all-boys school rocked by student-on-student abuse allegations said the football program was cancelled for next year.

Coal power in Canada must disappear by the end of 2029, new regulations say

Canada has significantly cut its dependence on coal largely due to the closure of all coal plants in Ontario.

‘Naive approach’ to China at fault in Meng mess: Scheer

Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer called on the Trudeau government to “unequivocally denounce any type of repercussions to Canadians on foreign soil.”

Omar Khadr ‘a model of compliance,’ wants changes to bail conditions: lawyer

Former Guantanamo Bay detainee Omar Khadr is back in court today to seek changes to bail conditions.

B.C. man linked to human remains probe gets absolute discharge on unrelated mischief count

Curtis Sagmoen was in Vernon Law Courts Dec. 13 for a mischief trial

Supreme Court upholds Canada’s right to reargue facts in assisted-dying case

Julia Lamb and the B.C. Civil Liberties Association are spearheading a challenge of the law

B.C. company facing several charges in 2017 chicken abuse case

CFIA investigation leads to 38 charges against Elite Farm Services and Ontario-based Sofina Foods

Most Read