Too much ink for harassment case

I am writing in regards to your November coverage of the Carter harassment case involving MLA Michelle Mungall

I am writing in regards to your November coverage of the Carter harassment case involving MLA Michelle Mungall, as well as to respond to Bill Levey’s letter to the editor on this topic (“No actions to ‘defend’ in hearing,” November 23).

I am new to Nelson. My response to your coverage of this particular case was one of wonderment. What is the purpose of your paper giving such unusually detailed coverage of this case? Is this about illustrating the challenges faced by modern day politicians? Is the situation extensively covered to titillate readers with the sexual innuendo reported in Mr. Carter’s comments? Or, does the extensive coverage constitute a subtle undermining of the credibility of a young, female politician?

I have worked extensively in the area of sexual harassment and bullying in the workplace. Had Mr. Carter behaved similarly in his workplace setting, his job would have been at risk. Rather than defending Mr. Carter’s “vitriolic voicemails” and worrying about the suspension of his “civil liberties” (should the judge grant a peace bond), Mr. Levey would be well advised to help his friend focus on the issues of concern without further use of demeaning comments, particularly those that are of a sexual nature. Mr. Suffredine as Mr. Cater’s lawyer may have a short memory, but I would be willing to bet that most female politicians who feel under threat recall the woman senator in Arizona who recently took a bullet to the head. Ms. Mungall and her staff would have been remiss had they not reported the Mr. Carter’s actions to the police. It was up to the police to determine whether sufficient evidence existed to warrant a charge against Mr. Carter.

This being 2011, I thought our society would now realize the benefits of encouraging and supporting more diversity in politics. Can personal attacks on a politician, especially those based on sexual innuendo and gender bias, repeatedly covered in a small local newspaper, be interpreted to have a political objective rather than responsibly covering the news?

Dale MacKenzie



Just Posted

Paramedics union raises alarm over spike in out-of-service ambulances

Staffing shortages affecting service levels in Kootenays

Update: Car located in Pend d’Oreille River, teenagers remain missing

A fundraiser has been set up at Kootenay Savings in Fruitvale to help support the family

Award winning documentary to be screened in Nelson

‘The Bikes of Wrath’ will run April 5 and 6 at The Front Room

LETTER: Clean water is a right for First Nations

From readers Sandra Hartline and Keith Wiley

Winlaw Elementary to get new playground

It’s being funded by the provincial government

Five highlights in the 2019 federal budget

Latest budget includes a sprinkling of money for voters across a wide spectrum

BC man ‘parks’ horse during liquor store pit stop

As long as animal wasn’t jaywalking, no problem, says Parksville official

’Full worm super moon’ to illuminate B.C. skies on first day of spring

Spring has sprung, a moon named in honour of thawing soil marks final super moon until 2020

Police lock down part of Armstrong after ‘live grenade’ discovered

An ordnance believed to be a grenade found on Smith Drive between Dairy Queen and Anchor Inn Pub

Dutch police question new suspect in deadly tram shooting

Police are looking for additional suspects in the shooting

Starbucks to test recyclable cups, redesign stores in B.C., U.S. cities

The company also said it plans to redesign its stores as it adapts to increasing mobile pick-up and delivery orders

In pre-election budget, Liberals boost infrastructure cash to cities, broadband

The budget document says the Liberals have approved more than 33,000 projects, worth about $19.9 billion in federal financing

‘That’s a load of crap’: Dog poop conspiracy spreads in White Rock

Allegation picked up steam through a Facebook page run by a city councillor

Facebook to overhaul ad targeting to prevent discrimination

The company is also paying about $5 million to cover plaintiffs’ legal fees and other costs

Most Read